Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Master Tapes - Genuine or Fake?

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Master Tapes - Genuine or Fake?

    I have cross posted this to WBF. However, I thought this would be useful for all the AN folks interested in tape. Myles, this could be a sticky. Took some time to write.

    I am posting this on the basis of my experience as a collector and listener of 15ips 2 track tapes for the past 15 years. I am not a professional and appreciate additions, corrections, etc. from others, including several professionals, in this thread.

    First, what is a master tape? Typically it refers to either the original master that comes out of a recording session or a copy of the original master used for producing the media.
    So an original master may be the original tape, often a multitrack, or the resultant mix down from multitrack to two tracks. I have in my collection only one set (7 reels) given on semi permanent loan to me from the engineer who did the recording in 8 tracks on 1/2 inch tape and did a mix down to 2 tracks which he has loaned me. This was from a jazz festival that he recorded (close to 4 hours of music) back in 1980 on contract from a producer. The producer stiffed him on the job and he kept the tapes. He used dolby A to encode the tapes and I ended up buying a pair of Dolby 361 decoders to be able to play them. Typically, the master tape has a data sheet with the logo of the recording engineer's company and the details of the recording, date, speed, number of tracks, equalization, noise reduction used (like dolby A), type of tape, recording level, test tones included and their level, etc. These are the crown jewels of the company doing the recording and normally stored very safely and almost never make their way into the hands of dealers or consumers. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_U...l_Studios_fire for the disaster that destroyed over 100,000 original master tapes). They are used to make the next level of master tape.

    The next level are production (sometimes called running) and their companion safety masters. These are copies of the master tapes and are used for cutting lacquers for vinyl records, digitizing for CD's and digital files, and for most dubbing to make consumer tapes. Both the production master and the safety masters are shipped to a mastering engineer. The safety master is a back up which is made to be identical to the production master if there is a problem with the production master. Normally the production master is returned to the entity that sent the tape. Often the safety master is kept by the mastering engineer, typically a souvenir of the job, for their collection. So most of the master tapes that make their way into the hands of consumers or dealers are safety masters.

    Production and safety masters can be produced over a number of years, recording records, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, CDs and/or digital media produced for sale in different countries or regions, even over decades, depending on the longevity and popularity of the album. My safety master of Miles Davis "Cookin'" album was done in the late '80's, more than thirty years after the original recording, either for a vinyl or CD reissue. They are used by a mastering engineer to make the lacquers for a vinyl release, digital files for a CD or digital release, etc.

    How does one know that the master tape (almost always a production or safety master) they have obtained is genuine or fake. First, it is impossible to be absolutely certain that it is genuine. It could be a carefully made fake. However, there are many clues that should be good evidence that the tapes are genuine. Here are some characteristics (most master tapes have at least several of these, the more the greater the certainty.)
    A. Provenance – If the source of the tape is the actual mastering engineer, that is the best. An unknown seller on ebay is the worst. I never buy tapes, master or otherwise on ebay.
    B. Original Data Sheet - if in pencil or pen, the writing should smear if a small amount of moisture is applied. The sheet may be taped to the box or included separately. It should have the name of the studio printed on it, with the various data typically written and not typed. There should be lots of information on the data sheet, including date, initials of the engineer, what test tones are included, equalization of tape, speed, number of tracks, tape type used, sometimes the tape recorder used to make the copy, what noise reduction was used if any (like dolby A). Copy machines today can make excellent copies of data sheets. Condition of the paper or other signs of age are helpful.
    C. Test tones on the tape - normally at least 1K, 10K, 100Hz (usually at 0db) and normally at the head of the tape, sometimes channel identification beeps - left and then right. Sometimes there are more test tones than the standard three. In any case, the test tones on the tape should match the test tones marked on the data sheet.
    D. Leader tape at head and tail and sometimes between songs on the tape. It takes quite a bit of work to splice leader tape between songs, so this is a good indication of a genuine master tape. However, most safety masters I have seen don’t have leader tape between songs. So absence of the latter is not a good indication of a fake.
    E. Reel and box of the proper vintage on the data sheet.
    F. Sometimes the type of tape is shown on the backing of the tape. If this matches the tape type listed on the data sheet this is very good. However, many tapes of the proper vintage don’t have markings on the backing. I showed one of my safety masters ("Katy Lied") to a person who had worked with Steely Dan on the 1990 reissues of their albums. He said, where did you get this? He opened the box and took a long whiff of the tape, pronouncing it genuine. Not sure exactly what he was smelling.
    G. Sometimes the tapes have the songs in a different order than the commercial release. The mastering engineer may change the order of the songs for the actual commercial release. I have a few master tapes like that.
    H. I normally make digital copies of all my tapes at 192/24. I can analyze the frequency response of the recording (I use Izotope RX3 software). One strong evidence of a fake tape is that there is a very sharp cutoff at 22kHZ on the tape. This is evidence that a CD was used as the source of the tape copy. There are some genuine tapes that have a cutoff around 22kHz, but those are normally more gentle in the cutoff and not exactly at 22kHz. People making fake masters may have a copy of the tape, so that the lack of sharp cutoff doesn’t mean it is genuine.

    Finally, tapes are quite sturdy if kept well. I have tapes that are approaching 70 years old that sound fantastic. However, they can deteriorate or if recorded with the wrong tape (like the infamous Ampex 456 or others that suffered from sticky shed syndrome) and they can be worn from overuse or misuse. I have had quite good fortune in my tape purchases, including many safety master tapes. However, I have been quite careful where I buy. Also prices of these tapes is never cheap, and often very expensive. The joy in playing can be well worth the effort.

    There are probably other hints that others can make to the thread. As always corrections, comments, additions are welcome.

    There are at least two sources of commercial tapes which are made from copies of the original 2 track mixdown masters or even the multitrack master that I have experience purchasing. These are the same generation as production or safety masters. I understand there are others who provide this generation of copy. However, the vast majority of commercial tapes for sale are copies from a production or safety master generation (or sometimes later).

    First is Jonathan Horwich who owns IPI (International Phonograph Inc) in Chicago. He records mostly small jazz combos, and some classical music. He sells both direct copies of his recordings as well as copies made from a production master. The direct copies are a bargain at $250 per reel and even less if you buy them during the initial week or two of their release. I own close to 40 of Jonathan’s releases, most of them direct copies.

    https://www.internationalphonographi...er-tape-copies

    Second is Opus 3 Records, a Swedish company who has been making albums for close to 50 years. They have released a fair number of their analogue recordings on tape, copies made directly from their original master tapes. They have limited the number of tapes made to prevent the original masters from excessive wear. They list how to order at a link at the bottom of their webpage. I own 12 Opus 3 albums, 24 reels in total. In the US, they can be purchased through Elusive Disc (Kevin Berg is their tape person).

    For more information on these master tapes - please see the CD version with the same number.


    Happy hunting and listening. Larry


    Analog- VPIClassic3-3DArm,Lyra Skala+MiyajimaZeroMono, 2xAmpex ATR-102,Otari MX5050B2,Merrill Trident Master Tape Pre,Herron VTPH-2A
    Dig Rip-Pyramix,IzotopeRX3Adv,Mykerinos,PacMicroModel2
    Dig Play-mchNADAC, LampiHorizon, Roon, HQP, Oppo105
    Electronics-Doshi Pre,CJ MET1mchPre, Cary2A3monoamps
    Speakers-AvantgardeDuosLR,3SolosC,LR,RR
    Other-2x512Engineer/Marutani Symmetrical Power, AudioDiskVinylCleaner, Scott Rust Interconnects,
    Music-2000R2Rtapes,50TBrips

  • #2
    A very informative and detailed writting. Thank you, Larry!
    Sketsoteric Audio: "Analog Sound, Digital Flexibility"
    http://mortechpr.wixsite.com/cassetteadventures
    http://mortechpr.wixsite.com/cgmasteringservices

    Comment


    • #3
      If it is an ORIGINAL master tape from the larger labels, in addition to test tones, it will undoubtedly contain FLUBS and/or RE-TAKES and related CHATTER from the control booth - ending with "take X". These re-takes are the first things edited to make a complete rendition of a particular song or movement. SO if you have what you think is a master, and there are complete songs; movements, whatever and no chatter, it's probably already been edited and dubbed once.

      Then there is the situation of whether the record companies allowed the actual master tapes to be edited (cut). I remember a TAS article saying that RCA and others mandated that any editing had to be done on a COPY, NOT the original. Apparently Mercury did allow the master to be edited/cut.

      U47 has some outtakes from Miles Davis with all the chatter. Fascinating stuff. Another friend is sending me some digital dupes of ACTUAL RCA 3-track (mixed down to 2-track) masters- Stokowski; Reiner et al, complete with retakes and chatter. Fidelity on the Stoky "Rhapsody" is amongst the best I've ever experienced!

      Comment


      • jonathanhorwich
        jonathanhorwich commented
        Editing a comment
        Good point. The only exception is some companies used to make a copy master which is a direct unaltered backup copy of the master in case the master was ever damaged. But other than that a true master will have glitches as noted above.

      • Foxbat
        Foxbat commented
        Editing a comment
        I have a bunch of 1/2" 30ips tapes with three or four takes of the same song on them, separated by white leader. I wonder where in the process these fit. Looks like original boxes with original hand writing on them. The quality is superb. Music - not so much.

      • astrotoy
        astrotoy commented
        Editing a comment
        In a recording session, there can be multiple takes - often in the tens of takes for every song. Many, many reels of tapes used. On a recent album that Tape Project did about 6 years ago (still not released), they used 24 reels of one-inch tape to do the sessions. This resulted in two 40 minute pieces. Not sure whether they recorded at 15ips or 30 ips. It was classical chamber music, so probably fewer takes than a lot of pop/rock. In parallel there was a digital recording being made by a separate team of engineers. Each reel costs about $200, so close to $5000 just for the tape. Not including paying the musicians, engineers, studio time, and post production, etc.

    • #4
      They could be masters or direct copies of the master. But that versions of a song are there could mean it is a master. At worst a copy of the master made for editing. Whatever it is if it sounds very good as you stated, it is a treasure no matter which it is.
      JLH

      Comment


      • Foxbat
        Foxbat commented
        Editing a comment
        Thank you Jonathan, that is what I thought.

    • #5
      There are some rare cases when recording the signal was sent to separate tape recorders and therefore one tape become “the safety copy tape” of the other. So its two original first generation tapes, being one of them a safety copy tape. Some rare 1” and 1/2” mono acetate tapes from the 50’s and very delicate…
      SEAS EXCEL DIY Speakers; CJ Premier 12; CJ Premier 14; CJ Premier EV1; Accuphase DP 85; MAC Airbook + Audionirvana plus+ Qobuz + Tidal; Micro Seiki RX 1500; Ikeda IT 407 12" + Ortofon MC A95; Thomas Schick 12" + Ortofon SPU 90th Anniversary; Fidelity Research FR64 FX 10" + Ortofon SPU Royal GM MKII; SME M2 12-R + Ortofon MC XPRESSION; Kenwood KD 7010 + Ortofon Jubilee; Revox B710; Revox A77; Revox PR99; Pure Silver DIY Cables; Sennheiser HD800; Sennheiser HDVD 800; Akai AT S-08 Tuner.

      Comment


      • #6
        My safety master of KOB has about 12 minutes of short outtakes. Miles sometimes talks about how he wants a particular piece done, etc. In addition there is an entire alternative take to the last piece in the album, Flamenco Sketches. This material all made it to one of the reissues (IIRC it was the Classics Record reissue, maybe the 45 version done in the '90's.) Many CD and other reissues have mined the old master tapes for alternative takes, and songs that never made it to the final album for bonus material for their reissues. CD's hold a lot more time than vinyl, so they are ideal for adding extra stuff.

        Larry
        Analog- VPIClassic3-3DArm,Lyra Skala+MiyajimaZeroMono, 2xAmpex ATR-102,Otari MX5050B2,Merrill Trident Master Tape Pre,Herron VTPH-2A
        Dig Rip-Pyramix,IzotopeRX3Adv,Mykerinos,PacMicroModel2
        Dig Play-mchNADAC, LampiHorizon, Roon, HQP, Oppo105
        Electronics-Doshi Pre,CJ MET1mchPre, Cary2A3monoamps
        Speakers-AvantgardeDuosLR,3SolosC,LR,RR
        Other-2x512Engineer/Marutani Symmetrical Power, AudioDiskVinylCleaner, Scott Rust Interconnects,
        Music-2000R2Rtapes,50TBrips

        Comment


        • #7
          Here's something a lot more subtle but MUCH more deterministic .

          When recording, EVERY machine leaves a "fingerprint or watermark" on the tape. It's the sine wave associated with the BIAS SIGNAL This is a pretty high level signal recorded at a frequency much higher than the audio range information, and as I like to explain to the technically minded, "shakes the shit" out of the magnetic particles on the tape, forcing them to behave in a much more linear manner, than without the "bondage".

          The frequency if this bias signal depended on the manufacturer - there was no standardization. It was also technology dependent - in the early days may have started around 50-75Khz but going way upwards as machine and tape technology improved. Yes, your machines have low pass filtering to keep the signal out of the record and reproduce electronics BUT it's there on the tape. You can see it by using an spectrum analyzer that can go up to a Mhz or so.

          For example, I just checked the specs on the Ampex 350 and ATR 100. The 350 bias frequency is listed as 100Khz; the ATR above 400Khz.

          So if "somebody" were to offer me a "master tape" (for a LOT of money), say an early RCA known to have been recorded on a 350, I'd play it and look at a spectrum analysis of the higher frequencies. If there was a peak impulse at other than around 100Khz - it's a FAKE - the tape was dubbed on some other machine..

          A few caveats; in the older machines, the bias was created in the analog domain by circuits that could have been mis-adjusted or drift off frequency over time. Later on the oscillators were digitally derived via very accurate crystal control. So on the early stuff, take the manufacturers spec +/- say 10%. And I don't know if the "dub" postulated above was recorded on a machine that had a higher bias frequency than the original, if you'd also see (on a spectrum analyzer) the artifact of the lower original bias frequency - i.e. TWO HF spikes.

          BTW, I believe that the Plantagennet (sp?) tape process process that apparently does a VERY good job of mitigatating/removing wow and flutter on older tapes, works on this concept of locking in on the frequency of the Bias signal and correcting the Lower frequency audio signal for any frequency variations - probably due to mechanical effects in the tape transport. Of course this process is / has to be done totally digitally. Those who have heard the results rave about it.

          Comment


          • #8
            The tape process that "fixed" bad, old tapes is the Plangent process. I've heard a couple of before/after and the results are amazing.

            Thanks, Larry for taking the time to educate us. I think that there is more to this than just getting a copy of "original masters".

            While the source is important, we also need to understand the art behind the tape, and which copy of "art" we are acquiring.

            As an example, if you have a copy of the multi-track recording master, the art of the mixing engineer to get the levels correct is critical. Hence, getting a copy of the 2-track mix-down master (while it is a second generation) would sound much better.

            From the 2-track mix-down master (or even a direct-to-2-track), the art of the mastering engineer then comes into play. To me, I would prefer a copy of the mastered music, even if it is another generation further down.

            Least of all, I would want a re-mastered copy that was mastered from a copy of the mastered music.

            As an example, we are now working on a release for Clair Marlo - Let It Go. A Sheffield Labs direct-to-2-track recording, it was hugely popular in Asia, and some of the tracks were multi-Platinum. We have done listening comparisons of copies of two versions put out originally by Sheffield Labs, the re-issue on Cisco music, a flat copy of the original direct-to-2-track master, and the result Bernie Grundman mastering from the original master (30ips tape and reference acetate). And there is no comparison, the Bernie Grundman master is much better in all aspects. It even sounds "fresher" than the original.

            So, while generational copying makes a big difference, what you are copying is even more important.
            Gary L Koh, CEO and Chief Designer
            Genesis Advanced Technologies, Inc.
            www.genesisloudspeakers.com

            Comment


            • #9
              Thanks, Gary. A great mastering engineer is a creative artist in his/her own right. Not just a copy machine. I heard the difference between the results that Winston Ma got from Paul Stubblebine when he had Paul remaster a bunch (I think it was 17 or more) of Decca albums from the original 2 track masters to the some of the same issues that Decca released on CD in their bargain (about 1 dollar per CD retail) boxes of 50 CDs. The latter had basically assembly line remastering - I am guessing basically flat, with the most important consideration being about to sell box of 50 CDs for $49.95 (or some very low price), including a nice box, booklet and retail markup included in the price.

              Larry
              Analog- VPIClassic3-3DArm,Lyra Skala+MiyajimaZeroMono, 2xAmpex ATR-102,Otari MX5050B2,Merrill Trident Master Tape Pre,Herron VTPH-2A
              Dig Rip-Pyramix,IzotopeRX3Adv,Mykerinos,PacMicroModel2
              Dig Play-mchNADAC, LampiHorizon, Roon, HQP, Oppo105
              Electronics-Doshi Pre,CJ MET1mchPre, Cary2A3monoamps
              Speakers-AvantgardeDuosLR,3SolosC,LR,RR
              Other-2x512Engineer/Marutani Symmetrical Power, AudioDiskVinylCleaner, Scott Rust Interconnects,
              Music-2000R2Rtapes,50TBrips

              Comment


              • #10
                Originally posted by CJSPU View Post
                There are some rare cases when recording the signal was sent to separate tape recorders and therefore one tape become “the safety copy tape” of the other. So its two original first generation tapes, being one of them a safety copy tape. Some rare 1” and 1/2” mono acetate tapes from the 50’s and very delicate…
                I'm not sure about the rarity? Think this was seen in the early days of stereo and simpler tracking such as three track. Know Columbia did it (KOB) and apparently Mercury did (35 MM and conventional 1/2-inch).
                Myles B. Astor, PhD, Administrator
                Senior Editor, Positive-Feedback.com
                ________________________________________

                -Zellaton Plural Evo speakers
                -Goldmund Telos 440 mono amps
                -Goldmund Mimesis 37S Nextgen preamplifier
                -Doshi EVO and Goldmund PH3.8 phonostage
                -VPI Vanquish direct-drive turntable
                -VPI 12-inch 3D Fat Boy dual pivot tonearm, VPI 12-inch 3D Fat Boy gimballed and SAT LM-12 arm
                -Lyra Atlas SL Lambda, Fuuga Mk. 2, vdh Colibri Master Signature, MutechHayabusa, Phasemation PP-500 cartridges
                -Technics RS1506 with Flux Magnetic heads, Doshi V3.0 tape stage (balanced)
                -Assorted cables including Transparent XL Gen. 6, Skogrand, Kubala-Sosna, Audience FrontRow; Audience FrontRow, Genesis Advanced Technologies , Goldmund and Ensemble Power Cords
                -Accessories including Stillpoint Aperture panels, Cathedral Sound panels, Furutech NCF Nano AC receptacles; Silver Circle Tchaik 6 PLC, Symposium ISIS and SRA Craz 3 racks, Audiodharma Cable Cooker, Symposium Ultra and assorted SRA OHIO Class 2.3+ platforms.

                Comment


                • CJSPU
                  CJSPU commented
                  Editing a comment
                  WESTMINSTER masters in acetate from 1953-56…

              • #11
                Originally posted by astrotoy View Post
                Thanks, Gary. A great mastering engineer is a creative artist in his/her own right. Not just a copy machine. I heard the difference between the results that Winston Ma got from Paul Stubblebine when he had Paul remaster a bunch (I think it was 17 or more) of Decca albums from the original 2 track masters to the some of the same issues that Decca released on CD in their bargain (about 1 dollar per CD retail) boxes of 50 CDs. The latter had basically assembly line remastering - I am guessing basically flat, with the most important consideration being about to sell box of 50 CDs for $49.95 (or some very low price), including a nice box, booklet and retail markup included in the price.

                Larry
                I think the definition of "better" is misleading in this regard. I wonder how much input the original artists had in the mastering process for the initial release. People like Leopold Stokowski and Glenn Gould were heavily involved with the whole process, and were quite particular with the sound they wanted. It might not be "the best" result for some people, but it is as much part of the personality of the performance as the actual playing of the orchestra or instrument. If you listen to the string tone of the original RCA shaded dogs and the later reissues. Which is better ? Arguably, the sound of the original shaded dogs was probably less faithful to the sound of the actual orchestra, but that is part of the character of the series. I don't hear this in many of the modern reissues, but it is present on some of the copies I own of the original production master.
                And to take this further with studio albums such as Dark Side of the Moon. I am sure some mastering engineers have their own ideas how the mix should sound, but are the "better" than what Waters and co envisioned ?

                Comment


                • #12
                  Originally posted by adrianwu View Post

                  I think the definition of "better" is misleading in this regard. I wonder how much input the original artists had in the mastering process for the initial release. People like Leopold Stokowski and Glenn Gould were heavily involved with the whole process, and were quite particular with the sound they wanted. It might not be "the best" result for some people, but it is as much part of the personality of the performance as the actual playing of the orchestra or instrument. If you listen to the string tone of the original RCA shaded dogs and the later reissues. Which is better ? Arguably, the sound of the original shaded dogs was probably less faithful to the sound of the actual orchestra, but that is part of the character of the series. I don't hear this in many of the modern reissues, but it is present on some of the copies I own of the original production master.
                  And to take this further with studio albums such as Dark Side of the Moon. I am sure some mastering engineers have their own ideas how the mix should sound, but are the "better" than what Waters and co envisioned ?
                  Truth be told, this applies to basically all of the early stereo recordings. (Especially the early Blue Notes.) And people are being intellectually dishonest denying this fact. I just saw that stuff in a recent review of the new Candid reissues in a recent review appearing in The Tracking Angle.

                  I also try not to be a snob when reading comparisons of the original pressings and reissues. (nothing to do with you here.) But I really can’t take many of these reviews seriously when they’re conducted on a $500 turntable on a FR limited, etc audio system.

                  Now we have a question of the tape generation used for pressing the original LPs, who did the mastering, how much did they compensate for the playback equipment of the day, etc,, but I think the Producers and Engineers of the day made the recordings the best they could from the beginning and didn’t rely on re-engineering, multiple takes and more. Then they having good ears judiciously did what they thought was needed to correct to bring the recording up to what they heard.
                  Myles B. Astor, PhD, Administrator
                  Senior Editor, Positive-Feedback.com
                  ________________________________________

                  -Zellaton Plural Evo speakers
                  -Goldmund Telos 440 mono amps
                  -Goldmund Mimesis 37S Nextgen preamplifier
                  -Doshi EVO and Goldmund PH3.8 phonostage
                  -VPI Vanquish direct-drive turntable
                  -VPI 12-inch 3D Fat Boy dual pivot tonearm, VPI 12-inch 3D Fat Boy gimballed and SAT LM-12 arm
                  -Lyra Atlas SL Lambda, Fuuga Mk. 2, vdh Colibri Master Signature, MutechHayabusa, Phasemation PP-500 cartridges
                  -Technics RS1506 with Flux Magnetic heads, Doshi V3.0 tape stage (balanced)
                  -Assorted cables including Transparent XL Gen. 6, Skogrand, Kubala-Sosna, Audience FrontRow; Audience FrontRow, Genesis Advanced Technologies , Goldmund and Ensemble Power Cords
                  -Accessories including Stillpoint Aperture panels, Cathedral Sound panels, Furutech NCF Nano AC receptacles; Silver Circle Tchaik 6 PLC, Symposium ISIS and SRA Craz 3 racks, Audiodharma Cable Cooker, Symposium Ultra and assorted SRA OHIO Class 2.3+ platforms.

                  Comment


                  • #13
                    Originally posted by astrotoy View Post
                    I have cross posted this to WBF. However, I thought this would be useful for all the AN folks interested in tape. Myles, this could be a sticky. Took some time to write.

                    I am posting this on the basis of my experience as a collector and listener of 15ips 2 track tapes for the past 15 years. I am not a professional and appreciate additions, corrections, etc. from others, including several professionals, in this thread.

                    First, what is a master tape? Typically it refers to either the original master that comes out of a recording session or a copy of the original master used for producing the media.
                    So an original master may be the original tape, often a multitrack, or the resultant mix down from multitrack to two tracks. I have in my collection only one set (7 reels) given on semi permanent loan to me from the engineer who did the recording in 8 tracks on 1/2 inch tape and did a mix down to 2 tracks which he has loaned me. This was from a jazz festival that he recorded (close to 4 hours of music) back in 1980 on contract from a producer. The producer stiffed him on the job and he kept the tapes. He used dolby A to encode the tapes and I ended up buying a pair of Dolby 361 decoders to be able to play them. Typically, the master tape has a data sheet with the logo of the recording engineer's company and the details of the recording, date, speed, number of tracks, equalization, noise reduction used (like dolby A), type of tape, recording level, test tones included and their level, etc. These are the crown jewels of the company doing the recording and normally stored very safely and almost never make their way into the hands of dealers or consumers. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_U...l_Studios_fire for the disaster that destroyed over 100,000 original master tapes). They are used to make the next level of master tape.

                    The next level are production (sometimes called running) and their companion safety masters. These are copies of the master tapes and are used for cutting lacquers for vinyl records, digitizing for CD's and digital files, and for most dubbing to make consumer tapes. Both the production master and the safety masters are shipped to a mastering engineer. The safety master is a back up which is made to be identical to the production master if there is a problem with the production master. Normally the production master is returned to the entity that sent the tape. Often the safety master is kept by the mastering engineer, typically a souvenir of the job, for their collection. So most of the master tapes that make their way into the hands of consumers or dealers are safety masters.

                    Production and safety masters can be produced over a number of years, recording records, cassette tapes, reel to reel tapes, CDs and/or digital media produced for sale in different countries or regions, even over decades, depending on the longevity and popularity of the album. My safety master of Miles Davis "Cookin'" album was done in the late '80's, more than thirty years after the original recording, either for a vinyl or CD reissue. They are used by a mastering engineer to make the lacquers for a vinyl release, digital files for a CD or digital release, etc.

                    How does one know that the master tape (almost always a production or safety master) they have obtained is genuine or fake. First, it is impossible to be absolutely certain that it is genuine. It could be a carefully made fake. However, there are many clues that should be good evidence that the tapes are genuine. Here are some characteristics (most master tapes have at least several of these, the more the greater the certainty.)
                    A. Provenance – If the source of the tape is the actual mastering engineer, that is the best. An unknown seller on ebay is the worst. I never buy tapes, master or otherwise on ebay.
                    B. Original Data Sheet - if in pencil or pen, the writing should smear if a small amount of moisture is applied. The sheet may be taped to the box or included separately. It should have the name of the studio printed on it, with the various data typically written and not typed. There should be lots of information on the data sheet, including date, initials of the engineer, what test tones are included, equalization of tape, speed, number of tracks, tape type used, sometimes the tape recorder used to make the copy, what noise reduction was used if any (like dolby A). Copy machines today can make excellent copies of data sheets. Condition of the paper or other signs of age are helpful.
                    C. Test tones on the tape - normally at least 1K, 10K, 100Hz (usually at 0db) and normally at the head of the tape, sometimes channel identification beeps - left and then right. Sometimes there are more test tones than the standard three. In any case, the test tones on the tape should match the test tones marked on the data sheet.
                    D. Leader tape at head and tail and sometimes between songs on the tape. It takes quite a bit of work to splice leader tape between songs, so this is a good indication of a genuine master tape. However, most safety masters I have seen don’t have leader tape between songs. So absence of the latter is not a good indication of a fake.
                    E. Reel and box of the proper vintage on the data sheet.
                    F. Sometimes the type of tape is shown on the backing of the tape. If this matches the tape type listed on the data sheet this is very good. However, many tapes of the proper vintage don’t have markings on the backing. I showed one of my safety masters ("Katy Lied") to a person who had worked with Steely Dan on the 1990 reissues of their albums. He said, where did you get this? He opened the box and took a long whiff of the tape, pronouncing it genuine. Not sure exactly what he was smelling.
                    G. Sometimes the tapes have the songs in a different order than the commercial release. The mastering engineer may change the order of the songs for the actual commercial release. I have a few master tapes like that.
                    H. I normally make digital copies of all my tapes at 192/24. I can analyze the frequency response of the recording (I use Izotope RX3 software). One strong evidence of a fake tape is that there is a very sharp cutoff at 22kHZ on the tape. This is evidence that a CD was used as the source of the tape copy. There are some genuine tapes that have a cutoff around 22kHz, but those are normally more gentle in the cutoff and not exactly at 22kHz. People making fake masters may have a copy of the tape, so that the lack of sharp cutoff doesn’t mean it is genuine.

                    Finally, tapes are quite sturdy if kept well. I have tapes that are approaching 70 years old that sound fantastic. However, they can deteriorate or if recorded with the wrong tape (like the infamous Ampex 456 or others that suffered from sticky shed syndrome) and they can be worn from overuse or misuse. I have had quite good fortune in my tape purchases, including many safety master tapes. However, I have been quite careful where I buy. Also prices of these tapes is never cheap, and often very expensive. The joy in playing can be well worth the effort.

                    There are probably other hints that others can make to the thread. As always corrections, comments, additions are welcome.

                    There are at least two sources of commercial tapes which are made from copies of the original 2 track mixdown masters or even the multitrack master that I have experience purchasing. These are the same generation as production or safety masters. I understand there are others who provide this generation of copy. However, the vast majority of commercial tapes for sale are copies from a production or safety master generation (or sometimes later).

                    First is Jonathan Horwich who owns IPI (International Phonograph Inc) in Chicago. He records mostly small jazz combos, and some classical music. He sells both direct copies of his recordings as well as copies made from a production master. The direct copies are a bargain at $250 per reel and even less if you buy them during the initial week or two of their release. I own close to 40 of Jonathan’s releases, most of them direct copies.

                    https://www.internationalphonographi...er-tape-copies

                    Second is Opus 3 Records, a Swedish company who has been making albums for close to 50 years. They have released a fair number of their analogue recordings on tape, copies made directly from their original master tapes. They have limited the number of tapes made to prevent the original masters from excessive wear. They list how to order at a link at the bottom of their webpage. I own 12 Opus 3 albums, 24 reels in total. In the US, they can be purchased through Elusive Disc (Kevin Berg is their tape person).

                    For more information on these master tapes - please see the CD version with the same number.


                    Happy hunting and listening. Larry


                    Thanks for all the effort Larry!

                    I think the truth is that a real master tape is rarer than hen’s teeth; maybe someone might find a master tape that was made by some up and coming band. Most are safeties. And then who the hell knows how well the transfers were done. Plus you do have to be sure not starting with a safety that is pre-EQ’d and ready for LP mastering.

                    Buying from eBay? Better off just flushing your money down the toilet.

                    As we know, many masters have also disappeared and been stolen out of the record vaults. Or lost along the way.
                    Myles B. Astor, PhD, Administrator
                    Senior Editor, Positive-Feedback.com
                    ________________________________________

                    -Zellaton Plural Evo speakers
                    -Goldmund Telos 440 mono amps
                    -Goldmund Mimesis 37S Nextgen preamplifier
                    -Doshi EVO and Goldmund PH3.8 phonostage
                    -VPI Vanquish direct-drive turntable
                    -VPI 12-inch 3D Fat Boy dual pivot tonearm, VPI 12-inch 3D Fat Boy gimballed and SAT LM-12 arm
                    -Lyra Atlas SL Lambda, Fuuga Mk. 2, vdh Colibri Master Signature, MutechHayabusa, Phasemation PP-500 cartridges
                    -Technics RS1506 with Flux Magnetic heads, Doshi V3.0 tape stage (balanced)
                    -Assorted cables including Transparent XL Gen. 6, Skogrand, Kubala-Sosna, Audience FrontRow; Audience FrontRow, Genesis Advanced Technologies , Goldmund and Ensemble Power Cords
                    -Accessories including Stillpoint Aperture panels, Cathedral Sound panels, Furutech NCF Nano AC receptacles; Silver Circle Tchaik 6 PLC, Symposium ISIS and SRA Craz 3 racks, Audiodharma Cable Cooker, Symposium Ultra and assorted SRA OHIO Class 2.3+ platforms.

                    Comment


                    • #14
                      Originally posted by astrotoy View Post
                      Thanks, Gary. A great mastering engineer is a creative artist in his/her own right. Not just a copy machine. I heard the difference between the results that Winston Ma got from Paul Stubblebine when he had Paul remaster a bunch (I think it was 17 or more) of Decca albums from the original 2 track masters to the some of the same issues that Decca released on CD in their bargain (about 1 dollar per CD retail) boxes of 50 CDs. The latter had basically assembly line remastering - I am guessing basically flat, with the most important consideration being about to sell box of 50 CDs for $49.95 (or some very low price), including a nice box, booklet and retail markup included in the price.

                      Larry
                      Winston was who gave me the appreciation for the art of mastering in the first place. I spent many afternoons in his room, and he in my room listening to the results of mastering. Sometimes, he preferred one version while I preferred another..... but at no time did either of us prefer the original over the mastered version. Sometimes, we would prefer one version in his room, and would prefer another version in my room. So, it is also system dependent........
                      Gary L Koh, CEO and Chief Designer
                      Genesis Advanced Technologies, Inc.
                      www.genesisloudspeakers.com

                      Comment


                      • #15
                        Thanks for all the insights. A few additional thoughts.

                        Certainly original masters are going to be almost impossible to find, particularly from commercial labels. It was said that Polygram bought Decca in 1979 solely for their back catalogue. So it was the master tapes and the related licenses that they wanted. They shut down the great presses at New Malden to move the pressing to Baarn and the Philips presses in Holland. John Dunkerley told me that the Decca engineers were horrified by the sound from the test pressings coming from Baarn. Polygram was smart enough to keep on some of the Decca engineers like Dunkerley, Mike Mailes, Jimmy Locke, etc. but Wilkie and I think Art Lilley both retired.So Decca continued to release recordings, mostly in digital, using the Decca made equipment (48Khz rather than 44KHz). They also still did continue to use tape, but less and less. BTW, that is why Chad used the stampers from Classic Records of the Decca produced albums for RCA (like Royal Ballet and Witches Brew) since the masters and other rights reverted back to Decca after I think a decade and the tapes are in Germany where the Decca, etc. classical tapes are stored by Universal. Thank goodness they were not stored with the other Universal master tapes lost in the big fire.

                        I've seen a few production masters which do show they were EQed for reproduction. You can see for some of the better selling albums that reissues have taken place all over the world and over many decades. Less so for classical titles, although some albums, like the Jacqueline du Pre Elgar Cello Concerto have never gone out of the EMI (now Warner) catalogue since its release almost 60 years ago.

                        One of my friends, a former Ampex engineer, has a nice collection of original masters he did for Ampex when he was working on the 30ips tape speed for the ATR-100 series machines in the '70s. He met Paul Stubblebine who taught him about recording and the friend went out to some local venues and taped the concerts. He lent me the tapes (1/2" 30ips AES EQ) and I made 15ips 2 track dubs, mostly on 1/2" tape. These include several classical chamber music tapes from members of the San Francisco Symphony and a local orchestra who were playing at a festival near the Ampex factory in Redwood City CA, as well as a very nice dub of a concert he recorded of Jesse Colin Young. I had to bake the tapes since they were all recorded with Ampex 456. But the dubs turned out great.

                        About artists being involved in the recording process, John Dunkerley told me about the recordings he and Wilkie did (Decca produced RCA recording) of Rubinstein playing the five Beethoven Concerti with Barenboim conducting the London Philharmonic at Kingsway Hall (mid '70s). Rubinstein, who was in his late '80's (this was his last cycle of the Beethoven concerti) would constantly complain that the piano wasn't loud enough in the recording (apparently this was not uncommon for soloists to want to be as prominent as possible in concerto recordings). Finally on the last day of the recording, Rubinstein brought along his son. Rubinstein's son introduced himself and asked whether the engineers could make the piano more prominent in the recording.

                        Larry

                        Analog- VPIClassic3-3DArm,Lyra Skala+MiyajimaZeroMono, 2xAmpex ATR-102,Otari MX5050B2,Merrill Trident Master Tape Pre,Herron VTPH-2A
                        Dig Rip-Pyramix,IzotopeRX3Adv,Mykerinos,PacMicroModel2
                        Dig Play-mchNADAC, LampiHorizon, Roon, HQP, Oppo105
                        Electronics-Doshi Pre,CJ MET1mchPre, Cary2A3monoamps
                        Speakers-AvantgardeDuosLR,3SolosC,LR,RR
                        Other-2x512Engineer/Marutani Symmetrical Power, AudioDiskVinylCleaner, Scott Rust Interconnects,
                        Music-2000R2Rtapes,50TBrips

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X