I want to expand my FB discussion recently posted. Apologies if you are seeing this twice.
Irradiating tubes improves the sound...Russian tube guys say yes...they sure do. For me it was a matter of logic. And no...I haven't heard any as yet. Love to though.
Coincidentally this note from WAVAC explains the effects of the radiation:
The phrase "thoriated tungsten filaments," used to describe their 805 tubes in the WAVAC literature, found me doing a bit of research. "Thorium dioxide is used as a stabilizer in tungsten electrodes in TIG welding, electron tubes, and aircraft engines. As an alloy, thoriated tungsten metal is not easily deformed because the high fusion material thoria augments the high temperature mechanical properties, and thorium helps stimulate the emission of electrons (thermions). It is the most popular oxide additive because of its low cost, but is being phased out in favor of non-radioactive elements such as cerium, lanthanum, rhenium, and zirconium."
Am I right to conclude its the significantly stronger release / emission of electrons that impacts the signal quality and characteristics? Creating more dynamic and responsive - faster signal characteristics?
Seems logical... and the answer I received was another yes. Gloves anyone?
Irradiating tubes improves the sound...Russian tube guys say yes...they sure do. For me it was a matter of logic. And no...I haven't heard any as yet. Love to though.
Coincidentally this note from WAVAC explains the effects of the radiation:
The phrase "thoriated tungsten filaments," used to describe their 805 tubes in the WAVAC literature, found me doing a bit of research. "Thorium dioxide is used as a stabilizer in tungsten electrodes in TIG welding, electron tubes, and aircraft engines. As an alloy, thoriated tungsten metal is not easily deformed because the high fusion material thoria augments the high temperature mechanical properties, and thorium helps stimulate the emission of electrons (thermions). It is the most popular oxide additive because of its low cost, but is being phased out in favor of non-radioactive elements such as cerium, lanthanum, rhenium, and zirconium."
Am I right to conclude its the significantly stronger release / emission of electrons that impacts the signal quality and characteristics? Creating more dynamic and responsive - faster signal characteristics?
Seems logical... and the answer I received was another yes. Gloves anyone?
Comment